- The world is rapidly moving towards the end of capitalism. From the latter is not much left: the market is almost gone, there is a global monopoly; the state withers away; skukozhivaetsya civil society; policy turns into a combination of administrative system and show business, money, lost a number of functions and largely ceased to be money; Europeans have lost one of their bases - work ethic, capital almost managed to swallow, eat work, but he himself against this ceases to be the capital.
1.1. Who builds a new world?
- At the same time the two processes are: the destruction of the old world and the new design. Old capitalist world capitalist breaks the tip - it is her more, at least in the long term, is not necessary. Since the mid-1970-ies there is a dismantling of capitalism. He seemed to be "going" in their "dodemokraticheskoe past," in the era of "iron heel" and the East India Company, these predecessors of the current multinationals, only steeper than the latter. Coagulation progress and there is a way to create a world tip of their new world. For most of humanity, this "new world" will turn the new "dark ages" - not to be confused with the Middle Ages, starting in the IX century. the collapse of the empire of Charlemagne. "Dark Ages" - the time between the middle of the VI. (Finally ceased to work the system Roman aqueducts; 476 of as the end of the Roman Empire - a false invention of the Roman pontiff, bulges thus its role) and the middle of the IX century.
Temnovekove - is, indeed, the era of darkness and blood, in contrast to the figures of the Renaissance slander and especially the Enlightenment (Voltaire rogues type) of the Middle Ages - a light, until the beginning of the XIV century. age; XIV-XVII centuries. - New temnovekove, which, however, was just as invitingly as it is a false facade - Renaissance.
1.2. Is there an alternative to the Western model of the future (the new dark ages)?
At the moment, such an alternative is viewed poorly. Now the main thing is not to be realized temnovekovomu project, but we'll see. The alternative -.. Resistance to the global agenda, ie, the rate of reduction in the barbaric world's population, the destruction of the state (sovereignty), family, science, education, health care, recently, as noted by M. Moore, turns into Sicko.
1.3 Is it possible to return to the path of development, in which the planet was 50-60 years ago?
- Hardly. Returns and restoration in the history of impossible. You can not repeat a unique era 1945-1975 years. - Leap of mankind, led by the Soviet Union in the future, jerk, artificially interrupted blunt Soviet nomenklatura and prudently tip of the capitalist world. The Soviet elite for the situational alliance paid off the destruction of the USSR.
1.4 Can I restore people's confidence in the future, hope and optimism?
- Optimism - a state of mind strong and solid people who can not simply change the circumstances, but to create them. Optimism - is a difficult, but at the same time of joyful work, often in defiance of fate. Optimism can not give, give, back. He is born in the struggle. Of course, there are biochemical (genetic) basis for optimism, however, optimistic - the social function of healthy societies. Suffice it to compare the Soviet society 1930-middle - the middle of 1960-ies ( "We have no barriers on land and at sea", "Andromeda" I. Ephraim and much more) with the Soviet society 1970-1980-ies - a tired, cynical, sarcastic and bleak. And this despite the fact that living in 1970-ies became more comfortable, easier and better fed; the fear is gone, but happiness has not come. 1960-ies were instantly brief hopes that were not fulfilled neither we, nor the world.
1.5 Can I put the progress at the service of all the people (or at least most)?
- USSR tried. And thirty years we came out it. So - it is possible. Only need to be vigilant and remember Stalin's warning that with the development of socialism, the class struggle intensifies, t. E. There is a threat of degeneration. And so it happened, with one of the first regenerated certain segments of the CPSU Central Committee and the KGB. Unfinished party Inquisition.
1.6 Dream - a rough draft of the future. What did people dream today?
- Different people dream about different things. It depends on what they are focused - on reality, Nav and rights. Ie. A world of dark and vulgar passions (wealth and pleasure at any cost to myself and to the detriment of others) or solidarity work based on social justice and the preservation of their ethnic and cultural identity.
The problem of the "golden billion" in the form in which it is formulated, is not the most dangerous, because it is eroded billion. In Europe, it blur the Arabs, Turks, Kurds, Africans, and there will be more and more. It seems that the European part of the "golden billion" written off and run into the "toilet bowl of history", or try a selective way with the help of people from the South to develop a new type of Europeans, which is not the number and skill will fight for the future. However, while young educated Europeans emigrating to Canada, Australia, New Zealand, but not in the US, where it will soon be too hot. After all, there are social problems involved in the race: negros, which is now called African-Americans, Hispanic (Latino). The racial and ethno-cultural composition of the West is changing. In fact, in the usual sense of the West have not. There postzapadnoe post-Christian society, is rapidly rolled into the "well of stories." Some plan to have those B. Disraeli called "masters of history" and a writer O. Markeev "masters of the world game," is there, but, first, it seems, the situation gets out of control. Secondly, it unfolds the struggle within the ruling elite of the world (because it is not united) for the future. It is these contradictions, and we have to play, as did Stalin 1930-ies.
2.1 What place is given to Russian and Russian (in a generalized sense of the word, ie. E. The inhabitants of Russia) on the plan?
- In the original plan for the Russian space, and many other non-Western peoples, I think not. But, again, the plan seems to be broken. However, several lines of the globalists are treated very harshly: the destruction of the state, the family, education, health and science. This is part of their global agenda. Therefore, no matter how loud rhetoric and situational action in foreign policy, I believe in the good intentions of such power only in our country, which will stop the massacre of science, education and health care, that is. e. will break the global agenda in these areas. What kind of a struggle for the sovereignty of the state today, if all goes well tomorrow, and no one there is nothing (no healthy men and brain) will defend him?
2.2 What plan can offer instead are we?
- Who are "we? The people, the oligarchs, power? To propose a plan, you need to have a strategy. To have a strategy, you need to have an ideology. Our state - formally - unemployed and non-ideological, and the lot of those who have in the world today is not ideology, and, consequently, its project for the future - a picnic on the sidelines of history in anticipation of that, maybe the owners will call for a new celebration of life. Do not even summoned to serve them "bad guys": "Rome does not pay traitors". The goal in Russia can be only one - to survive and win in the XXI century, preserving the identity of the population and territory.. This is - the minimum program. This can be done only by creating a social system based on social justice, then the power and the Motherland are the same. People can kill for money, but to die for the money no one will. For the Motherland - will, the Great Patriotic War is shown. That's why we won - for us was a just social system, whose anti-capitalist character of the collectivist-match Russian archetypes of consciousness and the unconscious, and cultural-historical code; in the words of Alexander Blok, Bolshevism "is a property of the Russian soul, not the faction in the State Duma."
XXI century will be a time of severe struggle for the future, when entire nations, ethnic groups, cultures will be mercilessly, without sentiment erased history eraser. Thugs from the government (their name is legion, one example - look at the face of X. Clinton) did not stop at nothing. In this fight, survive and win rallied social systems, welded single code's value, characterized by minimal social polarization and having a high percentage of carriers of knowledge, a kind of nation-corporation. Oligarchic system in this struggle will not survive, their fate - to become an economic fertilizer, manure for the strong; in fact, they are different and do not deserve. In the second half of the XX century. oligarhizirovavshiesya structure of power in the USSR twice blocked the progress and paid dearly for it. In the middle of 1960-ies of the USSR he was ready to make science and technology leap forward, becoming the system of anti-capitalism in the real postcapitalism, but it was in the interests of both the Soviet nomenklatura, and the top of the world capitalist class. The breakthrough was firmly locked, and rise in oil prices and detente contributed to the Soviet leaders a sense of calmness and deep satisfaction. We often remember the Brezhnev era with affection - stability, confidence in the future. And in the short term so it was, but in the medium (not to mention the long term, the Brezhnev era was eating up the future, time missed historic opportunities. "Baggy old ... fearing their own wives "(E. Unknown) profukali future system - she died in them and through them. And this despite the fact that in the USSR there was a super-multilayer scientific and technical complex, which was supposed to take off in the future is not later than the beginning 1990-ies. However, if x 1960-rush felled detente and the oil, the second - the restructuring, and the destruction of the USSR, which was based on the banal desire of the Soviet nomenklatura "enroll in burzhuinstve". It is hoped that took place in the end-1980's regime evacuation was not only financial, but also scientific and technical. However, the "shot of the future" - this is fine, but also by the need to not make a mistake.
3.1 whether science gives you represent you, the answer to these questions?
- Yes, it gives. Enemy Russia - global loan sharks, and serving them politicians, journalists, show figures, not only outside of our country, but also within it. In the latter case we are talking about regressors, crumbling values, intellectual and technological foundations of our society. But they only function faceless global matrix chapekovskie salamander, of which the writer said: "They come like a thousand masks without faces." In other words, the main enemy - the global matrix, a kind of grown to planetary dimensions spider Shelob from "Lord of the Rings." By the way, the idea of the global matrix (G-Matrix) as a structure and means, imposing a certain population the world thinking, put forward figures of the Club of Rome was still in 1970
3.2 there any mechanism for linking scientific achievements in practical politics (or diplomacy, or whoever decides today survival tasks and power) in our country?
- Survival Challenges and victories in every country should decide first of all the country's leadership. The question is, how skillfully and honestly it does, how much identifies with his country. Finally, how he developed the instinct of self-preservation, as he more grasping instinct and passion for a beautiful life. If the latter outweigh, then sooner or later it will be the story in the form of Shelob or his own people, and say with a wicked grin, "You sang it? This case: so go and also, I will dance "and dance, this is likely to be Dance macabre - Dance of Death!.
3.3 there any force in Russia that could lead her to salvation?
- I hope it is. But in general, the rescue of drowning - the handiwork of drowning. As sung in the "Internationale": "Nobody will give us deliverance: / Neither god nor king nor a hero. / We trying to achieve liberation / His own hand. " We long to swing, but quickly we go. So what hope is always there.
3.4 How to find them and unite?
- The best way to unity - a common cause on the basis of common values. But a common cause can be the rich man and the poor man, beggar and a thief?
3.5 What ideology should take Russia in the XXI century?
- Ideologies do not hang on a hanger in the store, they are born in the bloody and violent crises as an answer to the question, what kind of future we want for ourselves, our children and grandchildren. Great modern ideology - Marxism, liberalism (died 1910-ies, not to be confused with what is called so today in the West, and especially in Russia) and conservatism were born in Europe in the era of revolutions 1789-1848 years.
3.6 not whether Russia should create a military-clergy?
- Estates are not created, they arise in the course of history. I think, however, during classes, as well as the monarchy, passed - become obsolete, vixerunt, as told to Cicero. Especially strong in the history of Russian social class system, as well as the aristocracy, it was not.
3.7 400 Over the past years at the beginning of each century, Russia was involved in a war that threatens to destroy it:
1610-ies - Great turmoil;
1710-e - Northern War;
1810-e - the Patriotic War against Napoleon;
1910-e - the First World.
This is a coincidence or pattern? Now there are 2010-e.
- I can give you another number: Livonian (1558-1583), with Paul
necks (1654-1667), Seven Years' (1756-1763), Crimea (1853-1856), The Great Patriotic War (1941-1945). Their value is not less, so there is no mysticism of numbers.
4.1 Is every model, invented by man, will be able to function (ie. E. Be a viable)?
- Of course, not all.
4.2 Is every model will be able to develop?
4.3 there any criteria that allow to distinguish between viable and non-viable system at the stage of simulation?
- I'm afraid not. We can only assess the degree of probability. It may be frail model, but the world is changing, and this model is the most appropriate - is a recessive mutation in the development of biological systems. Conversely, there is a strong, well-adapted model, but the situation is changing rapidly and conditionally: the dinosaurs extinct, but marginal "shrew" capture the vacated ecological niches.
4.4 Is there a methodology that allows you to build a viable system known?
- In a rapidly changing world as soon as possible the principles of negative number -.. That is what not to do.
4.5 Do you own a model of the future with us?
- I do not see it. In general, the model born in the struggle, in particular - in resistance to evil.
5.1 Which one you mean?
- Systems theory - a universal thing, it has subsections, for example, the theory of living (anti-entropic) systems, where the company is part of.
5.3. Are there any in this application of the theory of systems, describing the society?
- There are different theories of social systems, for example, Marx's theory of formations, by the way, is not the worst. Theories Alexander Bogdanov, Vilfredo Pareto.
6.1 How do you feel about the work of Leo Tolstoy "Why do Christian nations in general, and especially Russian are now in distress"?
Tolstoy gave the obvious things - unlike of what, according to the Gospels, Jesus taught, what was the Bible project, which is at the origin of Paul, the last really much left of Saul. Indeed, where Jesus - love, and Paul Church - fear; Jesus clashed with the authorities, Paul and the church called to obey them. In the circuit of Paul much of the Old Testament - that the "window of vulnerability" of Christianity. It is no accident in Russia in the XIX century. The Old and the New Testament was not published under one cover. As for the differences between the dream revolution onnym impulse, on the one hand, and the organization, this impulse Dispose, then F. Dostoevsky spent the "Legend of the Grand Inquisitor." Jesus would hardly have thought of the Inquisition, Jesuitism, and the dogma of papal infallibility.
6.2 Do you agree with the thesis that after Christ, Christianity has been rewritten by the Pharisees?
- After Christ, Christianity was not rewritten, and created; creation process lasted 150-200 years (III-IV centuries. Mr. e) when the body of literature has been created and built -. on the model of the Roman Empire - and the territorial hierarchy. Bible project was developed, an adequate new era. Before that in the area of the Mediterranean social control bore external character, the most important were the "culture of shame" and externally-power control - "Egyptian model," which found the maximum expression in the Roman Empire and Roman law, the changed conditions demanded finer and deeper, internalized forms is not just a social, but social and psychological control - from the inside. Hence - "culture of conscience." T. e. the world and the man at the turn of the I millennium. BC. э. - I thousand. Mr. э. so complicated that one violence was not enough. Bible project - it is a combination of internal and external submission to the primacy of the first, with some of the functions of the external subordination took over the Christian church, so many social movements took the form of heresy.
By the end of the XV century. the Catholic Church is so compromised himself, and heresy is so undermined her position, she was challenged by Protestantism. As a blow to Catholicism and confronting him (on heat - up to the religious wars of the XVI -. The first half of the XVII century, in comparison with the figures that our Ivan the Terrible - an example of humanism and piety), Protestantism, paradoxically, not only weakened, but temporarily partly strengthened Bible project. First, he created his more modern (in terms of the orientation of the money of success in the selective exclusivity - in this respect Protestantism is the most Judaize version of Christianity), more brutal and at the same time a simple form; secondly, it became a kind of valve for the outcome of the disgruntled Pax Catholica, making the last peace. Но ненадолго. Time worked against both versions of Christianity, a breakaway from the orthodox (Orthodox). A new era for the structural and reflexive control which had to be institutionalized rational knowledge - science. It is no coincidence in the same France the development of such knowledge (eg, represented by Descartes) contributed to the Jesuits.
In XVIII - early XIX century. Bible project, bursting at the seams, survived another mutation: Christian faith has been abandoned, and first appeared protoideologiya as a project of the British Masonic lodges, sold mainly on French soil - the Enlightenment and then the ideology in its three basic forms: conservatism, liberalism Marxism. These were irreligious, that is. e. terminal form of the Bible Project, who spoke at the same time as a means of struggle, and as a form of social control became more complex social environment. As once the Christian priests have removed or destroyed priesthood (in the territory of Russia - Vedic), so in the XVIII-XX centuries. Masons, the ideologues of liberalism, Marxism, the Nazis attacked the Christian church. In this case, very appropriate to recall the phrase of St. Augustine that "punishment is not without fault," or, what judgment ye judge ...
Generally it must be said that the initial complexity of Christianity, reflecting the complexity of the European civilization of late antiquity era (the ancient elements of Hebrew and German traditions) - is both a strength and a weakness. The complex composition can be disassembled into parts. This is one of Islam - it can only hack to pieces, but Christianity is fraught with unexpected mutations. It also noted N. A. Berdyaev that Christianity is fraught with Catholicism, Catholicism - Protestantism, and Protestantism - atheism (I would add here Freemasonry). This one line. Catholicism is fraught with degeneration in neozhrecheskuyu hierarchy. And does the Pope after the adoption of the dogma of the infallibility of the pope - is not a high priest of the cult of neo-pagan in essence? A difficult relationship of Christianity and Judaism, already proclaimed by the Roman Pontiff, "the elder brother"? And is not "big brother" Big Brother? Someone will say, where paganism? Christianity - a monotheistic religion. But, firstly, the "paganism" - it is a negative label, which the representatives of the Abrahamic religions hung on all neavraamicheskoe. Second, Jews and Muslims have questioned the "sincerity firm" Christian monotheism - Trinity icon. So it is not so simple with Christianity, and that contributed to its expansion, it may be a serious problem. However, it seems that the Vatican understands this well.
Currently Bible project almost at the finish line, as well as the phenomenon of ideology; the world's elite are urgently looking for a replacement. And today about something you can guess. On the one hand, "the owners of the world game," famously krushat education and science, taking first and second in a closed structure, seeking to turn the population in the eternal adolescent, which is replaced by a culture of comfort and a sense of deep physical satisfaction. To give just two examples - American film and television. At the time, the journalist D. Robinson in the newspaper "The Times" wrote the following: "1985 year will go down in history as the darkest period in American cinema. It was in Hollywood this year after almost seventy years of domination in the industry dropped all pretense of the fact to be a healthy adult human intelligence. " And this is what told leading rather primitive transmission of health "live healthy" E. Malyshev. The program "On the night watching" (from the city of 11.02.2016), excitedly telling about his journalistic training together with other Eastern Europeans in the United States in the mid-1990's, she said, to whom they have been taught to be guided in their television broadcasts: "You have to do TV for simplicity of presentation for eleven immature teenagers. " Judging by the transfer, she does. What a contrast with the gears of the Soviet-era health, which led, for example, smart, intelligent, far away from complacency and reared E. Belyanchikova!
Conversion of adults in underdeveloped adolescents living not by the intellect, and hormone-instinctive programs, simply put, mental debilitation (that also serve all kinds of talk shows) pursues a simple goal: to educate absolutely non-self-identity, which will easily connect to a global communications network as a fully managed "cells." Creative, minimally intelligent person in the "cage" electronic brain, controlled neozhretsami and techno-mages, not turn.
On the other hand, more and more money is invested in research NBICS - nano-bio-info-socio-Cogne. It seems, goes on establishing remote control living on floating cities or in inaccessible land enclaves Psychosphere elite over the population. Something tells me today in the form and under the guise of distance education, the most primitiviziruyuschego education itself, is excluded from his personal principle (the teacher) and debiliziruyuschego object of study, in fact, practiced methods and forms of distance psihosotsiokontrolya "top" of the "lower classes". I think, however, this scheme fails, first of all - in Russia. Fighting regressors requires one important thing: they are not in any way be personalized, it is not the individual, and the functions of the Matrix biorobots outwardly civilized and sometimes comely orcs. But there is an orc orc t. e. something his will and adjusted not having a stranger ill will.
6.3 Is Christianity is not a religion created by the slave-owners for the slaves?
- Finally, if roughen, straighten and identify something on a social function, then yes, - Jesus, it is clear this is a different story. But Marx - this one, and Marxism - is another, that's why Marx said that he is not a Marxist. I wonder what Jesus said about the creators of the system of Christianity, not to mention the current state of the latter? I think it would recall its "not peace, but a sword ...". However, the "slave-owners and slaves" can be changed to the "feudal" and "peasants", "bourgeois" and "proletarian". The Christian Church has existed in three social systems - Antique-slave-owning, feudal and capitalist (and even in the system anti-capitalism - the USSR - was preserved, albeit in a modified form by the KGB).
6.4 Do you agree with the thesis that the confession of someone else (who came from other people) religion - it is a spiritual enslavement?
- Of course, I agree. It is a spiritual sabotage, when an alien implant John terioriziruetsya, and certain system (ethnos, state) becomes a breeding ground for self-realization of strangers. Borrowed Gods - it's like a loan at a very high percentage, but not have to repay the money, and warped historical destiny.
6.5 In lectures you say: "Horde period was the most favorable for the Russian Orthodox Church." Do the adoption of the Horde resulted in the XIV century Islam to fight for destruction?
- Failed. Orthodox priests prayed in the churches of the infidel king, accept them. But as soon as the Horde had gone into oblivion, Russian rulers immediately set about the church. The first steps in this direction was made by Ivan III of, continued - cool - Ivan IV, and - the least in form, but hard on the content - Alexis. Well, Peter I brought the form in accordance with the content: the patriarchate was abolished and instead established the Synod, de facto - Ministry of Ecclesiastical Affairs. So Bolshevik actions in relation to the Church, apart from the excesses of Lenin and Trotsky, and polutrotskista Khrushchev, quite in line with the tradition and the Russian authorities. In Russia since the days of Ivan the Terrible to defame the church has always been in power, an autocrat was the main church hierarchy, which in the case of what their place pointed quickly. That is why the Church and supported in 1917, the fevralistov anticipation of freedom from the supreme secular authority. It is very short-sighted: the Bolsheviks shortly explained it to them. By the way, at the same time, only much more brutally (Latin temperament), Mexican revolutionaries Catholic priests explained their historical wrong. The only trouble is that in both cases - the Russian and Mexican - have suffered a lot in no way guilty of simple priests.
6.6 whether we Suitable Orthodoxy as state ideology?
- Christianity is not necessary as the state ideology for several reasons. First, religion and ideology - is fundamentally different forms of organization of ideas; ideology in its essence is the negation of religion; Match functions in this case irrelevant. Secondly, in the words of V. G. Belinsky, a Russian man is not religious, he is superstitious. By the way, until the middle of XVII century, before Alexei reform -. Nikon on Russian Orthodoxy lay a strong imprint of the Vedic religion. Prior to that, there was no turning of the formula "I - the servant of God," instead - "the young man of God," that is. e. a descendant of the god. This is a typical formula of Vedic religion of the Slavs, in which the gods - human ancestors. Third, the Orthodox Church in Russia under, as well as under the monarchy of hell summed 1917 - Vixerunt (become obsolete). Interestingly, as soon after the February revolution, the soldiers were not allowed to go to prayers, more than 80% stopped doing it - such a "God-bearing people". In general, we have an idea about the Russian man is formed by several writers that Russian peasant hardly knew. It is above all, Leo Tolstoy and Fyodor Dostoyevsky, whose imagination (in one case the light "day", in the other - the sick, "night") we take for reality. Read something in this regard, it is necessary first of all H. Leskov, in part G. Assumption and A. Chekhov, even on smaller parts - I. Bunin. But this is the way. Fourth, Russia - polireligioznaya country, not to mention that we have plenty of atheists (Here I am, for example, an atheist). And the fact that the former communist rulers with a candle in the church are, so it they simply replacing party card. There was a party card now instead an icon and a candle. Like Habakkuk said, "Yesterday was isho blyadin son and topervo Batyushko". Fifth, in the world of religion takes time; the current explosion of Islamism - political phenomenon, is a rearguard action.
7.1 Why in the socialist camp was commonplace dissatisfaction with life and the government?
- There are several reasons. First, people do not appreciate what they had. They have seen photos or footage from Western movies - full of counters, 100 varieties of sausages and cheese, trendy clothes; They compared the salaries. At the same time they "forgot" how the West goes to the payment of taxes (up to 50%), "forget" about the paid health care and education, the credit slavery, short vacation. A host "forgot" to add to the salary of the expenses incurred by the system to provide free healthcare, education and more. When after the destruction, they felt it was too late. As stated in the Qur'an: "Let enjoy, then they will know!" Today it is clear: for Russia and Eastern Europe were the best decade of socialism in terms of well-being, and in terms of the historical subjectivity of time.
Second, socialism is - far more vulnerable to critique society. He postulates of social justice and equality, and they somehow just violated in the course of the development of socialism and the transformation of the nomenclature in the quasiclassical satisfying their material needs are largely in the West. This was a clear contradiction of reality and the ideals proclaimed by. But capitalism (and post-Soviet reality in the same Russian Federation, Czech Republic, Bulgaria and so on. etc.), especially when, after the destruction of socialism nobody to be afraid and ashamed of certain, however states:. Yes, we exploitative society, the market, competition - survival of the fittest - that is freedom. Many of the claims that could be brought to socialism can not be brought against capitalism. What can you say to someone who postulates: "Yes, that is me shit! This is the norm! "And what can I say? In other words, much of the dissatisfaction in the socialist countries - this discontent violation of the principles of socialism and a silly belief that this can be corrected by injection of capitalism.
I fix it? Got better? To paraphrase Gogol: "Well, son, you have helped your Pindos? He became the second Pindostanom your homeland? "
Third, almost all the inhabitants of Pax Socialistica in varying degrees irritated USSR, irritated Russian - strong always annoying. All of them - for various reasons: Poles - because we beat them and because, no matter how they boasted, great culture is not created, and as they were, and were (and still are) backyard of the West, and Russia and created a great culture, and empire; many people - because they formed under Hitler, but Russian is not only laid down, but also broke the backbone of the Third Reich; we have a win - one in Europe still have it? Russian - the only Slavic people of the imperial type, create a successful empire (the Serbs, too, imperial people, but historically, for objective reasons, it was hard to succeed). It opposes almost all Russian Slavs, as well as all non-imperial nations, who find themselves in the Russian orbit, but it did not work out the historical gratitude for the fact that Russian is always protected them from the West, especially the Germans, from the Teutonic wolf pack. So was right K. Leontiev in his skepticism towards the "Slavic brotherhood". "Imperial Brotherhood" is stronger. We must remember that when the middle of the XXI century. under the onslaught of millions of Arabs and Negroes Europe begins to crack and the people lomanёtsya in Russia for protection. We will have to "remember everything" - without malice, but without emotion, but with sober calculation. Enough to save the ungrateful, who on the second day after a rescue spit us back and begin to mow "by the West." When I hear the same Poles say "we - the West," I want to say to them: "Tell it to the Germans!"
7.2 Was it the result of a bad economy?
- Economy - element of the system; system (distribution of non-economic factors of production, class interest) defines an element, and not vice versa. In addition, the economy of the USSR and the socialist camp as a whole was not bad or weak. Let's look at the numbers.
Before 1985, Vol. e. before perestroika, the Soviet Union occupied the second place in the world and first in Europe in terms of industrial production. In 1975 was the specific weight of the USSR was 20% of the world industrial production (for comparison: in 1999, the US - 20,4%, EU - 19,8%); Soviet GDP was 10% of the world. In the same city of 1975 the national income of the USSR was 60-65% US national income. Israeli intelligence gave more pain Chiyah figures, according to the calculations of Israeli analysts, standard of living in the Soviet Union, including the free and paid services, as well as the so-called unranked humanitarian factors (crime rate, social protection), was 70-75% from the US and had a tendency to get closer to him. With at 1970 1975-th, the proportion of industries, the most determining the effectiveness of the national economy (engineering, power, chemical and petrochemical industry), increased from 31% to 36%; then began thrashing, but made to 1975 of level was high. At the same time during this period the release of engineering products increased 1,8 times, including computer equipment - in 4 times (at the turn of 1960-1970-ies were curtailed most important trends in this area, but not all, however, is lagging behind the US computer was growing rapidly), instrumentation, automation equipment and spare parts - in 1,9 times. In 1975 was with a population of 9,4% of the world's CMEA gave more than 30% of world industrial output and more than 25% of world income; USSR produced 60% CMEA industrial products. Since 1951 1975 by city the share of the socialist countries in world industrial production increased 1,5 times (with 20% to 30%), while the share of the capitalist countries declined from 80 50% to% (and the US - with 50% to 22-25%).
Added to this is the success of Soviet agriculture 1985-1990 years. and especially Mr. .: 1991 9,8% growth was compared with 5,8% in the previous five-year period. The USSR provided the lowest food prices in Europe. Food consumption per capita in 1990-1991 years. peaked in our history of XX century .: bread - 119 kg, meat - 75 kg, fish - 20 kg, milk and dairy products - 386 l, eggs - 97 pieces. 1990 and 1991-th years were marked by an exceptionally large harvest and the growth of livestock. And the shelves in the shops were empty at the same time - the deficit was created deliberately to permanently embitter the population of cities against socialism provoke unrest. At collective farms deliberately not to buy their products, instead of agricultural products purchased from Canadian farmers - in 5-6 times more expensive. Thus demolished and farms. All this was done, and more, in order to intimidate a population threatened by famine, to justify higher prices. The latter, it seems not that other, as the expropriation of money from the population, was to deprive the people the financial capacity to participate in the privatization, which had planned for her. Intimidation of the population government and official media in the fall of 1991 it was thus essential preparatory action privatization.
In fact, no threat of hunger was not, it was a lie, immediately exposed by experts later confirmed the correctness of the CSB. Е. T. Gaidar insisted that the six-month requirement of the country in the bread is supposedly 25 million tons, and at the end of 1991 in a country supposedly it has only 10 million tons with a monthly consumption of 5 million tons; The conclusion is that in two months - the hunger and the threat of civil war. It is at this keeps lying liberal myth of the "Gaidar - the country's savior." The reality was quite different. Gaidar consciously thought bread with coarse grains, ie. e. monthly consumption - 2 million tons; To this we must add the available 2 million tons of the State Reserve and 3,5 million tons of grain for import, which was supposed to arrive in December 1991 - 1992 January, Vol. e. until the next harvest in late July - early August, the 1992 this is more than enough. But the real lie Gaidar was not even 5 million tons of monthly country bread consumption, and that 26 million tons - is the annual, semi-annual rather than consumption, and confirmed that the statistical report of 1992 However, the fall of 1991 Yeltsin's team was able to push through his lies in all the media.
7.3 whether the system is possible, like a socialist, but with a good economy?
- I have already said that a socialist economy was not weak; moreover, it has been successful, especially in comparison with the capitalist as it may sound paradoxical. We have, unfortunately, bad imagine the reality of the US economy in 1970-1980-ies. Now we are not socialism - we have a good economy? In most parts of the capitalist world - economy is bad and hard life. This is recognized even by such apologists for capitalism-Westernism, as G. Yavlinsky and E. Gaidar. They fixed the "miserable condition" and "chronic poverty" of the majority of the capitalist countries. However, the recipe for success have been a strange renunciation of sovereignty on the part of the path of Euro-Atlantic integration, or - peripheral and poverty. It is difficult to say what is more - a deliberate lie or impenetrable stupidity. After all, it is a concession to the sovereignty of the West, which leads to the dictates of the TNC, and is a cause of poverty and the peripheral most of the capitalist countries. capital world - a world of poverty, with growing: in 2009, the 1% of the population owned 44% of global wealth; in 2014, the - 48%; in 2016, the - 50%. In 2015 was below the poverty line (living on less than US $ 1,25. per day) 830 million people lived in peace. (14% of the population); More about 40 2% live on dollars. a day. "Good economy" - in that part of kapmira who robs weak (colonies, semi-colonies) and churns out dollar bills. Yes, once again marvel, people with some level of intelligence has thrown upward adjustment and post-perestroika. However, perhaps it is such and picked up for the implementation of semi-colonial scheme.
7.4 deficit and turn - it is an indispensable companion of socialism?
- Unfortunately, Deficits economy - a characteristic feature of socialism, in the form in which it actually existed in history. She has several economic and political reasons. This is, firstly, the need for accelerated development of the military-industrial complex and to maintain strategic parity with the West at a lower GDP than the collective West. At the same time we must remember that in the socialist camp the main military burden fell on the Soviet Union, while NATO military expenditures were somewhat more evenly. For example, in 1975 city military expenditure of the Warsaw Pact - US $ 110,3 billion, of which the USSR - 99,8 billion.; NATO - 184,9 billion, of which US - 101,2 billion; 1980 of respectively 119,5 and 107,3 billion billion billion and 193,9 and 111,2 billion. Naturally, countries such as the industrialized GDR and Czechoslovakia, faced with significantly lower deficits. As for Poland, Romania, Hungary and Bulgaria, it was originally a very poor country. Now in all these countries, there is no shortage, and people live much worse.
In the USSR in 1990, Vol. e. on the eve of the collapse of the system, where we have been told how everything is bad, and frighten the coming famine, the consumption of meat and meat products was 78 kg per capita (import - 13%), and after 15 years in Russia - 57 kg (imports - 35%). So all is not necessary to measure the deficit as an isolated figure. Secondly, of course, have been economic reasons for the deficit associated with the specifics of socialism as a system - cumbersome administrative system, the lack of improvement of the socialist planning methods; so, in the planned economy of the USSR de facto ceased to exist in 1972-1973 years. and replaced by a conciliation economy that tried to "cure" capitalist methods. Dolechilis. Thirdly, the lack of bad economic system compatible with life, was created in the Soviet Union artificially 1989-1990 years. through the implementation of state-owned enterprise law (adopted in June 30 1987, at all enterprises came into force on January 1 1989 g). According to this suicidal for the economy of the USSR law, a large number of companies received the right to direct access to the world market, that is. e. was de facto abolished the monopoly of foreign trade. Products of these companies implemented in the global market for dollars; then internally we exchanged dollars for rubles, and there is a huge mass of the ruble, not the provision of goods. In the USSR, since the credit reform 1930-1932 years. hard to maintain a balance between the mass of commodities, and the money supply, and bank transfer between nalom. Action on the law of the state enterprise in the city of 1989 It broke the system, and people rushed to sweep away from the shelves of all that was in the shops. В 1990-1991 гг. other zealous "democrats" openly called for the masses to create a deficit of anger against the system, against socialism, as salvation from which slips "market economy", ie. e. capitalism.
In general, I must say that we still live myths - about themselves, about the Soviet Union, on pre-revolutionary Russia, our historical figures. After 1991, on the shield suddenly stood committed to raise losers make them figures of historic proportions - Alexander II of, laid the foundation of revolutions and 1905 1917 years, Stolypin, Nicholas II.. All this is projected onto today's reality and, being based on poor knowledge of history, fraught with negative practical results.
Example: create Stolypin club (which, incidentally, was assigned to the development of the economic development program of the Russian Federation). Club name Stolypin. The organizers, apparently based on the fact that it was a successful statesman, decided tasks that faced the country. Well, of course: recall the words of Stolypin "great Russia" and so on. n However, if "stolypinoklubniki" better know the history, it is likely to be doubted how be called a boat, so it will float. It is one thing - "Victory", another - "... the trouble." Apparently, strawberries impressed that Stolypin wanted to spend a massive privatization of land (and forced) and destroy the collective farm. It is in the spirit eltsinschiny, schemes Gaidar - Chubais and overseas supervisors. Here are the results of the Stolypin reforms - bummer. The reform did not stop falling all indicators per capita, on the contrary, it has accelerated them, and the impoverishment of the peasantry of the country has become the center of catastrophic proportions.
First Agricultural Congress, held in Kiev in 1913, at fixed: most farmers did not get anywhere reform - failed. The Provisional Government was recognized in 1917 Stolypin reforms failed. It is significant that in 1920, during the Civil War, the peasants returned 99% of land in communal ownership - response Stolypin peasants.
Stolypin - a typical reformer loser, his work - this is not to win but to trouble, including the order system, which protects the interests of Stolypin and the existence of which is sought to be extended.
Even more disastrous were the results of political reform. In an effort to destroy the community, Stolypin turned most massive layer of naive monarchists, conservatives, wherewith were peasants in agrarian revolutionaries. And what would happen to Russia if Stolypin turned would-be reformer, even scary to think. In this case, the revolution in Russia would occur, the commercials in 1912-1913-m or m, as the city turned out to be thrown 20-30 million lost their land peasants who would not find in a city is no work. It was then, and would sharahnulo, with much cooler than in the city of 1917 Stolypin - against his will - and so brought a revolution, but it would bring her even more.
And the thought creeps in: can, "stolypinoklubniki" know it all and secretly sympathize with the revolution? Have any ideas on this? Probably not. But then - hot school textbook on the history of the hands.
This is just one example of how to mishaps causes poor knowledge of their own history, and there are many examples.
8.1 It was an accident or a reaction smarter planet (and even the cosmos) to the destruction of her man?
- Geological and climatic catastrophes occurred before humans. Even today, the scale of human activity still so small, that a global catastrophe will not pull geoclimatic. Do not listen to unscrupulous environmentalists. But we must protect nature, including the human. With regard to the term "reasonable", it is unlikely that it is applicable to the planet. I would suggest: organized integrity, focused on the maintenance of equilibrium, that is. e. self-preservation, and removes any elements that threaten the whole. Outwardly, it looks like a reasonable behavior, but this is something else - not worse or better - more.
8.2 serious attitude to them Western elites - is a manifestation of the fact that they know more than us about how nature works?
- First, know more, our Western elites older. Secondly, they are better organized, they are rooted in its history. Our "elite" - pre-Petrine, St. Petersburg, the Soviet - were relatively short period of time, to become truly elite. In addition, we have the dominant group has never been independent, representing the functional authority and elitism - it is always subjectivity.
Research on the possibility of geoclimatic catastrophe underway in the West behind closed doors last 50-60 years. According to my information, in the middle of 1980-ies in Western researchers came the belief that in the Western Hemisphere at the end of 1990-ies pro catastrophe and that only stable area is the territory of the USSR. In the early 1990-ies anxiety subsided, terms receded, but the threat of catastrophe geoclimatic will not go away.
8.3 Do you think it possible to view our planet itself erases deadlock branch of development, whether it be dinosaurs or unpromising civilization ( "Lucifer's Hammer")?
- Quite possible. Planet - a holistic system.
- I agree, but the feeling of pain is, it appears ugly - in affectation, for example. This pain korezhit even freaks and sociopaths. And as your metaphor, I sometimes think that there is a huge tumor, which is perched on the edge of what remains of the healthy society. Here involuntarily recall the "Occam's Razor".
9.1 top does not experience discomfort when hit bottom in a difficult position.
- Horse riding, as a rule, generally insensitive towards the lows, especially those tops, which yesterday got out of the mud, which in its essence - antiaristokratichny, dud. Suffice it to recall the recent history, when another group of "aristocrats of garbage" required to protect them "Patrick" from the "ball" of the sleeping areas of Moscow. People do not realize that their social racism themselves incite class hatred, which then hit them or their children. They would read John Donne: "Ask not for whom the bell tolls, it tolls for thee."
9.2 bottoms do not have freedom of maneuver for the release of the difficult situation.
- The social triumph baseman - a rare thing in history. The USSR was for several decades a triumph of the common people, but since the mid-1950's popular socialism Stalin era began to turn into a "nomenklatura socialism" head clerks, which since the end of 1960-ies really wanted to integrate into the global capitalist system; that they were the masters of the world socialist system, they are not inspired.
And the world kapsistema associated with many of these people, as well as in post-perestroika their heirs, with a sweet and beautiful life, often - in its most vulgar form. It reminds me very much dream gangster John of Colorado from the film "Gold McKenna", carefully storing the faded newspaper "Parisian Life", which depicts kankaniruyuschie girls, rich pubs and their patrons. "Parisian Life" - the dominant behavior.
Those who exchanged sotssistemu world, alternative to capitalism, offended that they did not reserve a place in the center of kapsistemy. Disease, earlier you were masters of large systems; agreeing on the "Entry burzhuinstve" t. e. for inclusion in other large systems as its element, you have agreed to the position of small proprietors sistemki, turning it into more. Integer defines an element, and not vice versa. Proprietor can not sit next to the host on which it is only the steward. It is with the owner of a large system of the USSR were the hosts of the West on an equal footing, and now - excuzes nous (excuse us). It turned out for Timur Kibirov: "We are zablevali platform. / And here we are persecuted, we derive. " Even with Brezhnev flowing into senility, no Western leader would not have allowed himself to speak as the late Gorbachev or Yeltsin.
- The current capitalism is the cesspool. One of his characters - an installation with feces, torn jeans and fishnet female underwear.
10.1 Can the planned economy crisis-free, focused on the satisfaction of human needs?
- Hardly. The non-equilibrium and non-linearity - the inherent quality of wildlife; "Eternal rest heart unlikely to be happy, eternal rest for the gray pyramids." And speaking of the new century, it will generally be global "buntashny Century", instability and crises - its norm.
10.2 Can the resource based economy, where finance occupy a subordinate position allotted to them?
- Of course, it is possible. Enraged finance - it is a sign of the deadly disease of capitalism, its "kiss of death". None of the social system, in addition to capitalism, and then only at a later time, a lethal phase, we have not seen such an all-embracing power - not even money, but something strange, because money is essentially withered away. If you can print as many pieces of paper backed by nothing, it means that none of the five basic functions of money in these papers do not. It's sort of hearth, painted on canvas.
10.3 What prevented Leontiev to develop a theory of an economy?
- I do not know. Maybe the time has not come; We may have interests in the other; maybe the US - not the best place for the development of such a theory.
- Historical science can not offer anything. Offer people, t. E., Historians, and they tend to deal with the past, with often describe his pieces. Scientific history - istoriologii - has yet to be established.
The forecast for the near future is simple: capitalism dies, he is hardly live till the middle of the XXI century, and certainly not live up to the beginning of XXII century. Dying he will be ugly and bloody. A large part of the planet varvariziruetsya. White people on it will be much less, and they will fight to the death to remain in history, but - are to blame, that allowed this situation. Already, children, especially boys (they will grow men), it is necessary to educate for life in wartime: "If you want peace - prepare for war." And you need to bring up the example of not homosexuals and prostitutes, and to the heroic examples. Note: screens heroics vanished, disappeared from classrooms portraits of pioneers-heroes.
Ideology and religion remain in the past, their place is likely to take the magic, it is closely related to high technology, primarily cognitive. The level of a society's culture as a whole will fall. Heirloom library will become a luxury, but a strong-willed intellect and knowledge futuroarhaicheskom world will be valued very highly. Tip to parents: seriously concerned with the education of children, do not let EGEizirovannoy school to turn them into cosmopolitan morons.
If disaster does not happen, then the turn of the XXI-XXII centuries. the situation will stabilize and there will be a new social system, very far-away from that describe the great Ivan Efremov in "Andromeda" and early Strugatsky in the book "The Return. Noon, XXII Century. " What specific system - it depends on who and how in the XXI century. win in the fight for the future. Conclusion: it is necessary to raise the winners. However, all may change the geo-climatic catastrophe or, for example, a huge asteroid, as it happened 65-70 thousand. Years ago, when humanity left by thousands, if not hundreds of people who have slipped through the "bottleneck" of history. We - their descendants. It is possible that (conditional) grandchildren of our grandchildren will have to live through a disaster of this kind. This does not mean you have to be pessimistic, on the contrary. As taught by the great Marxist XX century. Antonio Gramsci: "pessimism of the mind, but the optimism of the will". Or in the words of the hero of the story D. Aldridge "last inch": "A man can do anything unless nadorvёt navel." To be able to, you have to have the strength; to not ruptured navel - the mind. Coupled with the understanding of the global development trends - is a powerful triad needed to win. Forward to the victory!